An Icelandic fishing company bribed officials in Namibia and used Norway's largest bank to transfer 70 million dollars to a tax haven

Iceland largest fis­hing company Samherji used accounts in DNB NOR, a stately owned Norwegian to trans­fer the proceeds of its fis­hing in Africa. Part of the money comes from Samherji's fis­hing of horse mackerel in Namibia were the company has paid bribes to officials to secure its access to quotas.

An Icelandic fishing company bribed officials in Namibia and used Norway's largest bank to  transfer 70 million dollars to a tax haven
In Iceland with Samherji's CEO The three Namibi­ans who have gotten bribes from Samherji in Namibia are seen here on a visit to Iceland in 2013 with Þor­steinn Már Bald­vins­son, the CEO of Samherji. On the photo are also João de Barros, the son of the for­mer fis­hing mini­ster of Angola and an adviser to the Angolan mini­ster, Antonio

Iceland’s largest fis­hing company, Samherji, trans­fered  more than 70 million doll­ars through a shell company in the tax haven Marshall Islands from 2011 to 2018. Samherji trans­fer­red the money through bank accounts in Norway´s largest bank DNB NOR. The bank’s largest  shareholder is the Norwegian state, which holds a 34 percent stake in the bank.

The  money consisted partly of proceeds from Samherji´s questionable and possi­bly unlawful operations in Namibia where the company bribes officials to get secure access to fis­hing quotas. The company in the Marshall Islands was used to pay sal­aries to the crews of Sam­herjis factory trawlers . These trawlers fis­hed horse mackerel in Maurit­ania, Morocco and Namibia. 

The information about Samherji’s bribes and its money trans­fers to tax havens and Cyprus is gathered from documents that Wikileaks made availa­ble to Stundin, the Icelandic investigative TV-program Kveikur and the Qatari TV-station Al Jazeera. Stundin is publ­is­hing the information in cooperation with these parties. 

Wikileaks has publ­is­hed 30.000 of the documents on its webpage under the name The Fishrot Files.

Too riskyDNB NOR thought that main­ta­in­ing Cape Cod FS as the bank's client was to risky because the bank did not know who the beneficial owner was. Rune Bjerke is DNB NOR's CEO.
"They do not hesitate to use bribes and break the law so that they can take as much money as they can out of the country.“

DNB NOR thought that the client was too risky

In May 2018 DNB NOR closed the bank accounts of the Marshall Island shell company, Cape Cod FS, after a  U.S. bank, Bank of New York Mellon, declined to allow a transaction from it mother company JPC Ship Mana­gement to go through its system. The actions of the U.S. bank resulted in an investigation of the Marshall Island company, and later "off boar­ding", as the Norwegians called it, at DNB NOR. Off boar­ding a client means that a bank closes the bank accounts of the clients and cuts of all business with the client. 

According to a risk assess­ment und­er­ta­ken by the Norwegian bank, it was deemed  too risky to allow Cape Cod FS to remain as a client in the bank: ”[T]he necessary resources to manage the sanction risk will be too high.” The sanction risk in this case was the possi­ble fine that aut­horities in the U.S., mainly the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), could levy on DNB NOR because of its lax anti-money laund­er­ing controls. 

After an internal investigation DNB NOR conluded that it did not have any  information about the beneficial owner of Cape Cod FS. This is aga­inst the so called ”KYC-rules”, which were explicitly enacted to combat money laund­er­ing. According to the KYC-rules a bank must know the real identity of the clients, that trans­fer money through its systems.  Samherji had been using Cape Cod for seven and a half years by the time DNB NOR discovered that it did not know the identity of the beneficial owner, even though it was Samherji that financed Cape Cod through its subsi­di­aries in Cyprus and Namibia.

"Big man"Bernhard Esau is sometimes called "Big man" in Samherji´s internal e-mails. He is seen here in the home of his son-in-law with Þor­steinn Már Bald­vins­son.

Proceeds based on corruption

The money that Samherji trans­fer­red to Cape Cod FS included proceeds of Samherji’s company in Namibia, were it caught horse mackerel using several gigantic factory trawlers, each of which was crewed by a around a hund­red working men. Samherji secured access to the horse mackerel quotas in Namibia by pay­ing bribes of around 10 million U.S. doll­ars to politicians and official employees in Namibia between 2012 and 2018.  The bribes continued after Cape Cod FS was off-boar­ded as a DNB NOR client in 2018.  

The politicians, officials and related parties in Namibia who took bribes from Samherji are Bernhard Esau, the fis­hing mini­ster of Namibia; his son-in-law Tamson ”Fitty” Hatuikulipi, who worked as ”consultant” for Samherji; James Hatukulipi, an  investor and the chairman of the board of the state owned company Fishcor which distri­butes fis­hing quotas in Namibia and Sacky Shangala, the current justice mini­ster of Namibia and for­mer att­orney general. The fifth  indi­vi­dual is Mike Nghip­unya, the CEO of Fiscor. 

Samherji’s CEO and big­gest shareholder, Þor­steinn Már Bald­vins­son authorized the bribe pay­ments says Jóhannes Stef­áns­son, the for­mer general mana­ger of Samherji’s operations in Namibia. It was then Jóhannes Stef­áns­son who implem­ented the bribe pay­ments he says.  Stef­áns­son is now a whistleblower working with anti-corruption aut­horities in Namibia, and other countries, that are investigat­ing or looking into the Samherji-affair. Mr. Stef­áns­son ass­erts that: ”Nothing is paid without his [Þor­steinn Bald­vins­son's] prior consent.“

No replies from Samherji´s owners

Þor­steinn Már Bald­vins­son has not been willing to grant Stundin, Kveikur or Al Jaazera interviews about the documents described here. When asked about the issue by Kveikur´s journalists, after a radio interview in Iceland at the end of October, he deflected with a comment about the weather: ”The weather out here is beauti­ful I think.” Þor­steinn Már said before dod­ged any further questions by slipp­ing into a coffee shop.  

Samherji’s second largest shareholder and de facto general mana­ger in Iceland, Kristján Vil­helms­son, refu­ses to discuss the matter: When Stundin interviewed Kristján by tel­ephone at the end of October he stated that: ”I will not answer any questions from you, not about this matter or any other. […] I do not owe you answers about anyt­hing.“

3.5 million dollars to a shell company in Dubai 

One example of the extent of the bribes Samherji paid is a 3.5 million dollar pay­ment to company called Tunda­vala Invest­ments Limited in Dubai. Tunda­vala Invest­ments Limited is owned by James Hatuikulipi.  The pay­ments were made from a company which Samherji owns in Cyprus, Esja Seafood Limited, one of its main international hold­ing companies. Esja Seafood has bank accounts in DNB NOR, and those were used to make the pay­ments under the guise of ”consulting fees“. This company in Cyprus has also paid bribes to bank accounts in Namibia, for example to a company which is owned by the son-in-law of Namibia¨s fis­hing mini­ster, Tamson ”Fitty” Hatukulipi. 

The indi­vi­du­als who took the bribes all belong to the largest and most dom­in­ant political party in Namibia, the SWAPO-party, which has received a majority of the votes in every general election since Namibia became an independent country in 1990. Bernhard Esau also sits on the polit­buro of the SWAPO-party which is orig­inally a communist party that fought for Namibia’s independence from apartheid South Africa in 20th century. The party’s place and status in Namibian politics can be likened to the ANC in South-Africa; it is the dom­in­ant force in Namibian politics.

Says that the bribes are justifi­able to SamherjiJóhannes Stef­áns­son, the whistleblower in the Namibia-case, says that the bribes are justifi­able according to Samherji because they mean that the company gets access to fis­hing quotas.
“Bribes are of course never termed ”bribes”; they are ”facilitation pay­ments”, often made by the resource extraction companies to local companies for unspecified services and whose beneficial owner is opaque.”

For Samherji the end justifies the bribes 

The pay­ments were refer­red to as ”consulting fees” which is common in cases of bribery. Another eup­hem­ism which is sometimes used to hide the fact that bribery is tak­ing place is the description of the transaction as a ”facilitation fee”. As the English economist Paul Collier, a pro­fessor at Oxford and a specialist in the economics of Africa, says in his book The Plund­ered Planet: Why We Must--and How We Can--Manage Nature for Global Prosperity”: "Bribes are of course never termed ”bribes”; they are ”facilitation pay­ments”, often made by the resource extraction companies to local companies for unspecified services and whose beneficial owner is opaque.“

Jóhannes Stef­áns­son says that the pay­ments were bribes even though they were couched in other langu­age. Tamson and James had no prior knowledge or experience of the fis­hing industry in Namibia before they started build­ing up their relationship with the Icelandic fis­hing company. What they sold to Samherji was access to political power in Namibia says Jóhannes. ”Samherji does whatever it takes to get its hands on the natural resources of other nations. The company deceives and makes empty promises all in order to exploit these resources. They do not hesitate to use bribes and break the law so that they can take as much money as they can out of the country and leave not­hing behind but burnt soil and money in the pockets of a corrupt political elite.“ 

Jóhannes  Stef­áns­son says that during his first meeting with Tamson the latter showed  him  a pho­tograph of him­self, at his own wedding with the fis­hing mini­ster, Bernhard Esau, his father- in-law  - Berhard Esau is the father of Tamson’s wife Ndapandula. 

In most countries, including Namibia, it is illegal to bribe politicians and official employees. Sim­il­arly, it is a pun­is­hable offence to pay bribes to politicians and govern­ment officials in other countries. 

Bribes and money laundering

Because Samherji´s operations in Namibia are based on the pay­ment of bribes, which are an illegal offence in the country and in other countries where Samherji operates , the trans­fer of the revenue which the company´s fis­hing in Namibia creates can possi­bly be defined as money laund­er­ing. Taking into account that Samherji sipho­ned the money to the Marshall Islands, which is a tax haven, and that DNB NOR eventu­ally considered the risk of main­ta­in­ing Cape Cod FS as a client too high because of the possi­bility that the company being used to launder money, a grim picture of what Samherji was doing emerges. 

Money laund­er­ing is defined as the act of introducing  money, gained from unlawful activities like drug trafficking or the spoils of corruption, into "the the normal economic system” says Ólafur Hauksson, the head of the district att­orneys office in Reykja­vik. Iceland. - ”Money laund­er­ing is a huge problem in society because it is crime which makes it possi­ble for criminals to use money, which is not right­fully or lawfully theirs  in a leg­itimate way. If they succeed then this creates a further incentive for the criminals to continue mak­ing money by break­ing the law.“

Unclear who owned Cape Cod FS

What is especially inter­est­ing in this case is that the documents reveal that DNB NOR bank never knew who owned Cape Cod FS and that is one the rea­sons why the bank declined to continue to offer services to the company last year. The financial director in one of Samherji’s daughter companies abroad, Katla Seafood in the Canary Islands, was one the three indi­vi­du­als who had the right to trans­fer money from Cape Cod FS, according to documents from 2010 which were sent in when Cape Cod FS opened bank accounts in DNB NOR. The two others were employees in a Cypriot asset mana­gement company called Cyproservice. In these documents it is declared that Cape Cod FS had its tax liability in the Marshall Islands. 

Cape Cod FS was said to be owned by a shipp­ing company in Cyprus called JPC Ship Mana­gement, a German owned staffing agency which operates in Cyprus. This company supp­lied the Samherji’s trawlers in Africa with employees from the Baltic states and the Ukraine - Samherji called them ”Russians” in internal e-mails - for these services JPC got 11 doll­ars per per­son a month. Technically, JPC Ship Mana­gement was never the owner of Cape Cod since all its money came from Samherji and its companies in Cyprus and Namibia. JPC Ship Mana­gement seems to have simply been the stated owner of Cape Cod from 2010 to 2018 whereas Samherji was indeed the company that financed and used Cape Cod. The front company in such a scheme, where the real owner of company is hidden from view by another company which ser­ves as its cover, is called a ”rat­hole” in the parlance of money laund­er­ing. 

The company “no longer under” Samherji 

Even though DNB NOR never received verification of who the beneficial owner of Cape Cod was, the bank thought that the company belonged to Samherji. In a risk ana­lysis, the bank said it had “no knowledge” who the beneficial owner was but in the documents where the bank stated why it decided to kick Cape Cod FS out of the bank as a client by closing its bank accounts it said. “No lon­ger under Samherji. Three indi­vi­du­als own the company.”

The three indi­vi­du­als refer­red to where the owners of JPC Ship Mana­gement. Even though the bank stated this, its employees did not beli­eve that this was the case as it was the banks assess­ment that it in fact had ”no knowledge” about who owned Cape Cod FS. 

10 percent of Samherji's revenueAround ten percent of Samherji's revenue has come from its fis­hing in Namibia. One of its ships, the factory trawler Heinaste, is seen on this picture.

The man in charge does not remember the company 

Brynjar Þórsson, the for­mer financial director of Katla Seafood in the Canary Islands, and the per­son who was in charge of runn­ing the company’s bank accounts according to an internal document from Samherji, says he does not rem­em­ber  Cape Cod FS. ”I have to admit that I do not rem­em­ber this name” he says. ”I did the money trans­fers to the employees of the ships, I do not deny that, but I do not rem­em­ber which bank accounts I used.”  

Þórsson worked for Kata Seafood and Samherji for two and a half years after Cape Cod FS opened its bank accounts in DNB NOR. In the sum­mer of 2013 Samherji sold Katla Seafood to the Russian fis­hing magnate Vitali Orlov and his company Murmansk Trawl Fleet. Þórsson  continued working for Orlov until the end of 2015. 

So Brynjar Þórsson  did not work for Samherji the whole time that the company used Cape Cod FS, from 2011 to 2018, and there were many money transactions from Namibia to the accounts of Cape Cod FS, after he quit working for Samherji. It ther­efore must be emphasized that Brynjar does not bear responsi­bility for all the transactions through Cape Cod FS and he had not­hing to do with Samherji’s bribes in Namibia. 

While Cape Cod FS was active it trans­fer­red 70 million doll­aras in more than 13 thousand trans­fers from 2011 til 2018. 

Samherji stayed on as a customer of DNB NOR

What is remarka­ble about what happ­ened after DNB NOR closed the bank accounts of Cape Cod FS is that this fact had no influence whatsoever on the Norwegian bank’s business relationship with other companies which Samherji owns, and the company was allowed to continue to use its various others bank accounts in DNB NOR. Among those were the bank accounts of the company Esja Seafood which was used to pay bribes to Namibi­ans, James and Tamson Hatuikulipi, in Dubai and Namibia. 

DNB NOR thought that allowing Cape Cod to continue as the bank’s client was too risky, but neverthel­ess allowed Samherji, which according to the bank´s own assess­ment had controlled the Marshall Island company, to continue as a large client in the bank. 

Samherji is still DNB NOR´s client and the Norwegian bank is the fis­hing company’s hub abroad, its main business bank. 

Browder´s war on money-laundering in Nordic banks

The story of Samherji using a shell company in the tax haven of Marshall Islands through DNB NOR may not come as sur­prise to those who have followed the debate about money laund­er­ing in the Nordic countries of Sweden, Finland, Denmark Norway and Iceland over the last year. 

In 2018 and 2019 media in Sweden publ­is­hed stor­ies about how the Baltic affili­ates of Denmark´s largest bank, Danske Bank, and Swedbank in Sweden had been used to launder money from criminal activities in Russia. These scandals caused a stir and had many consequences, e.g. Swedbank’s CEO, Birgitte Bonnesen, was forced to leave her job and Sweden’s for­mer PM, Göran Persson, was appointed as the chairman of the board of the Swedish bank to try to clean up after the scandal.

On the basis of these reports  the American investor, hedge fund mana­ger and for­mer res­ident of Russia, Bill Browder, who is one of Vladimir´s Putin’s hars­hest critics, has  tried to get prosecutors in Denmark, Finland and Sweden to open criminal investigations into the money laund­er­ing which took place in banks in the Nordic countries. 

Browder beli­eves that Putin was behind the kill­ing of his lawyer Sergei Magnit­sky in 2009 and he has thras­hed the money laund­er­ing controls of the Nordic countries. He claims that Nordic banks aided Putin and his cronies to launder money that they stole from him and his hedge fond, Hermitage Capital Manag­ment.  According to Browder the kill­ing of Magnit­sky was in part to cover up the fact that  money was sto­len from his company. Browder makes the argu­ment that the banks who ass­ist criminals who launder money from Russia are collaborating with the forces who killed Magnit­sky and that they are ther­efore ”second or third order crooks”. 

In an interview with The Wall Street Journal ear­lier this year Browder was asked how this could happen in the Nordic countries, nation states which are supp­osed to be among the least corrupt in the world: ”Well, what I can say about Denmark … Every law firm in town has some business with Danske Bank. We’ve been looking for a lawyer in Denmark, and everybody is conflicted. Everyone sort of trusts everybody. What it does is it means if somebody has done somet­hing bad, they don’t really have the psychological infrastructure to come down like a ton of bricks on the people that did bad stuff, because everybody assumes maybe they didn’t, and they said they didn’t, and so on and so forth.” 

As of to date not­hing has come out of Bill Browder’s attempts to get aut­horities in the Scandinavian countries to open these criminal investigations. 

DNB NOR doesn't know how many clients it off boards

Like the banks which Browder has been criticising DNB NOR has also been criticised for its poor controls aga­inst money laund­er­ing and financing of ter­r­orism. The Financial Supervis­ory Aut­hority (FSA) of Norway has said that the bank did not take sufficient care to mon­itor  its client transactions through the bank and that it ther­efore risked  being a vehicle for money laund­er­ing. The institution  did say in a report publ­is­hed last year that it seemed to be the case that DNB NOR  had improved its mon­itor­ing of possi­ble money laund­er­ing in the bank. In a FSA report publ­is­hed in in August this year the institution said agin that it  found shortcomings in DNB NOR´s controls aga­inst money laund­er­ing. “The company’s over­all follow-up and coordination of AML [Anti-money laund­er­ing] has not been satisfactory.” 

The information about how the Icelandic fis­hing company Samherji has used DNB NOR for many years to trans­fer money to and from a company in The Marshall Islands seems to be one example of the poor the controls of DNB NOR aga­inst money laund­er­ing. It was not until the American bank, Bank of New York Mellon, stopped a money trans­fer from Cape Cod FS that the Norwegian bank finally off boar­ded the company because it did not know who its beneficial owner was. 

DNB NOR’s spokesman, Even Westerveld, says in his answers to general questions concerning how the bank fights money laund­er­ing within the bank that it does not know how often it happ­ens that a client’s account is closed because the beneficial owner is not known or because it is beli­eved that the client is engag­ing in money laund­er­ing through the bank. ”Like every other bank we are guided to take action if the clients do not give us the necessary information that we need to have so that the bank can have a good control over how the client uses the bank. This can sometimes mean that the bank freezes the accounts of clients or off boards him. Unfort­una­tely we do not officially hold count how often this happ­ens within the bank,” says Westerveld. 

DNB NOR´s spokesman says that the bank cannot answer the question how many cases of possi­ble money laund­er­ing the bank has sent to the police in Norway in the last few years. ”Unfort­una­tely we cannot  go out with that type of information […] The war on money-laund­er­ing is a fight aga­inst org­an­ised criminal networks that are constantly develop­ing new met­hods. At the same time the reg­ul­atory frameworks must at the same time change itself and evolve accordingly. Ther­efore we will never reach our goal but must instead work constantly towards improv­ing our met­hods.“

To date Samherji’s use of DNB NOR for these transactions from 2011 to 2018 has not had any repercussions. Not for Samherji, or for DNB NOR. 

Kjósa
0
Hvernig finnst þér þessi grein? Skráðu þig inn til að kjósa.

Athugasemdir

Allar athugasemdir eru ábyrgð á þeirra sem þær skrifa. Heimildin áskilur sér rétt til að fjarlægja ærumeiðandi og óviðeigandi athugasemdir.
Tengdar greinar

Samherjaskjölin

„Tími á að íslensk stjórnvöld axli siðferðislega ábyrgð á Samherja“
FréttirSamherjaskjölin

„Tími á að íslensk stjórn­völd axli sið­ferð­is­lega ábyrgð á Samherja“

Leiðtogi namibísku stjón­ar­and­stöð­unnar segir landa sína undr­ast þögn íslenskra stjórn­valda um þá stað­reynd að stærsta spill­ing­ar­mál í sögu Namibíu hafi orðið til fyrir til­stilli íslensks fyr­ir­tækis. Spyr hvort hund­rað millj­óna styrkur Orku­sjóðs sé rík­is­styrkt spill­ing og sendir for­sæt­is­ráð­herra opið bréf og óskar lið­sinnis hennar við að fá Samherja til að greiða bætur og svara til saka.
Samherji sakaður um stórfelld skattalaga- og gjaldeyrisbrot í Namibíu og framsalskrafa væntanleg
RannsóknirSamherjaskjölin

Samherji sak­aður um stór­felld skatta­laga- og gjald­eyr­is­brot í Namibíu og fram­sal­skrafa vænt­an­leg

Rík­is­sak­sókn­ari Namibíu er enn ákveð­inn í því að óska eftir fram­sali þriggja stjórn­enda Sam­herj­a­fé­laga í Namibíu og segir brot á skatta- og gjald­eyr­is­lögum muni mögu­lega bæt­ast við sak­ar­efnin á hendur þeim. Stór­felld skatta­laga­brot Sam­herj­a­fé­laga sögð til rann­sóknar. Sam­herj­a­maður segir íslensk yfir­völd þegar hafa neitað að fram­selja sig.
Íslandsvinkona svo gott sem orðin forseti Namibíu
FréttirSamherjaskjölin

Íslands­vin­kona svo gott sem orðin for­seti Namibíu

Netumbo Nandi-Ndaitwah, utan­rík­is­ráð­herra Namibíu, sem kom hingað til lands í júní og ræddi Sam­herj­a­málið við íslenska ráð­herra og aðstoð­ar­mann eins þeirra, er nú svo gott sem búin að tryggja sér for­seta­emb­ættið í Namibíu. Hún var í morgun kjörin arf­taki for­manns flokks­ins, sitj­andi for­seta sem hyggst setj­ast í helgan stein. Flokk­ur­inn nýtur slíks yfir­burð­ar­fylgis að inn­an­flokks­kosn­ingin er sögð raun­veru­legt for­seta­kjör.
„Þetta eru glæpamenn og hegða sér eftir því“
ViðtalSamherjaskjölin

„Þetta eru glæpa­menn og hegða sér eftir því“

Jóhannes Stef­áns­son, upp­ljóstr­ari í Sam­herj­a­mál­inu, er sáttur við gang rann­sókn­ar­innar hér á landi og segir að fátt geti komið í veg fyrir að málið endi með dómi. Hann gagn­rýnir þó aðgerð­ar­leysi yfir­valda við því þegar Sam­herj­a­menn hafa áreitt, njósnað um eða reynt að hræða hann frá því að bera vitni. Fátt í við­brögðum Sam­herj­a­fólks hafi þó komið honum á óvart, enda fái þau að ganga mun lengra en öðrum lið­ist.

Nýtt efni

Mest lesið undanfarið ár